Fix outdated comment in fiat METADATA file

After https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/75852, we
started using LICENSE-APACHE instead of LICENSE-MIT.

Change-Id: I889154950c876ed37fce7cfcdf7c866685d9cfca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/98347
Reviewed-by: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Benjamin
2026-07-01 11:49:02 -04:00
committed by boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
parent c9bcd2b144
commit 24720b76bb
+1 -1
View File
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ third_party {
version: "6ccc6638716d4632304baf1adbb5c47c3a12ea6f"
last_upgrade_date { year: 2022 month: 3 day: 22 }
local_modifications: "Files renamed to .h for BoringSSL integration. LICENSE file is LICENSE-MIT from upstream."
local_modifications: "Files renamed to .h for BoringSSL integration. LICENSE file is LICENSE-APACHE from upstream."
}