mirror of
https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl
synced 2026-07-21 14:43:51 +00:00
bd6f41c308
... and then run clang-format on the changed files to reflow any comment blocks that exceeded line lengths. (Which generated a bunch of noise formatting changes, but probably that reduces noise in future CLs.) No semantic change to the code. Change-Id: I455da9faaaedda3e751ac91b5eb43cbc662d68a6 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/97367 Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Auto-Submit: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
255 lines
11 KiB
C++
255 lines
11 KiB
C++
// Copyright 2017 The BoringSSL Authors
|
|
//
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
#include <limits.h>
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <iterator>
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
|
|
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "test/test_util.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSSL_NAMESPACE_BEGIN
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
// C and C++ have two forms of unspecified behavior: undefined behavior and
|
|
// implementation-defined behavior.
|
|
//
|
|
// Programs that exhibit undefined behavior are invalid. Compilers are
|
|
// permitted to, and often do, arbitrarily miscompile them. BoringSSL thus aims
|
|
// to avoid undefined behavior.
|
|
//
|
|
// Implementation-defined behavior is left up to the compiler to define (or
|
|
// leave undefined). These are often platform-specific details, such as how big
|
|
// `int` is or how `uintN_t` is implemented. Programs that depend on
|
|
// implementation-defined behavior are not necessarily invalid, merely less
|
|
// portable. A compiler that provides some implementation-defined behavior is
|
|
// not permitted to miscompile code that depends on it.
|
|
//
|
|
// C allows a much wider range of platform behaviors than would be practical
|
|
// for us to support, so we make some assumptions on implementation-defined
|
|
// behavior. Platforms that violate those assumptions are not supported. This
|
|
// file aims to document and test these assumptions, so that platforms outside
|
|
// our scope are flagged.
|
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
static void CheckRepresentation(T value) {
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE(value);
|
|
|
|
// Convert to the corresponding two's-complement unsigned value. We use an
|
|
// unsigned value so the right-shift below has defined value. Right-shifts of
|
|
// negative numbers in C are implementation defined.
|
|
//
|
|
// If `T` is already unsigned, this is a no-op, as desired.
|
|
//
|
|
// If `T` is signed, conversion to unsigned is defined to repeatedly add or
|
|
// subtract (numerically, not within `T`) one more than the unsigned type's
|
|
// maximum value until it fits (this must be a power of two). This is the
|
|
// conversion we want.
|
|
using UnsignedT = std::make_unsigned_t<T>;
|
|
UnsignedT value_u = static_cast<UnsignedT>(value);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(UnsignedT), sizeof(T));
|
|
|
|
// Integers must be little-endian.
|
|
uint8_t expected[sizeof(UnsignedT)];
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(UnsignedT); i++) {
|
|
expected[i] = static_cast<uint8_t>(value_u);
|
|
// Divide instead of right-shift to appease compilers that warn if `T` is a
|
|
// char. The explicit cast is also needed to appease MSVC if integer
|
|
// promotion happened.
|
|
value_u = static_cast<UnsignedT>(value_u / 256);
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(0u, value_u);
|
|
|
|
// Check that `value` has the expected representation.
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(Bytes(expected),
|
|
Bytes(reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t *>(&value), sizeof(value)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(CompilerTest, IntegerRepresentation) {
|
|
static_assert(CHAR_BIT == 8, "BoringSSL only supports 8-bit chars");
|
|
static_assert(UCHAR_MAX == 0xff, "BoringSSL only supports 8-bit chars");
|
|
|
|
// Require that `unsigned char` and `uint8_t` be the same type. We require
|
|
// that type-punning through `uint8_t` is not a strict aliasing violation. In
|
|
// principle, type-punning should be done with `memcpy`, which would make this
|
|
// moot.
|
|
//
|
|
// However, C made too many historical mistakes with the types and signedness
|
|
// of character strings. As a result, aliasing between all variations on 8-bit
|
|
// chars are a practical necessity for all real C code. We do not support
|
|
// toolchains that break this assumption.
|
|
static_assert(
|
|
std::is_same_v<unsigned char, uint8_t>,
|
|
"BoringSSL requires uint8_t and unsigned char be the same type");
|
|
uint8_t u8 = 0;
|
|
unsigned char *ptr = &u8;
|
|
(void)ptr;
|
|
|
|
// Sized integers have the expected size.
|
|
static_assert(sizeof(uint8_t) == 1u, "uint8_t has the wrong size");
|
|
static_assert(sizeof(uint16_t) == 2u, "uint16_t has the wrong size");
|
|
static_assert(sizeof(uint32_t) == 4u, "uint32_t has the wrong size");
|
|
static_assert(sizeof(uint64_t) == 8u, "uint64_t has the wrong size");
|
|
|
|
// size_t does not exceed uint64_t.
|
|
static_assert(sizeof(size_t) <= 8u, "size_t must not exceed uint64_t");
|
|
|
|
// The positive maximum of `int` must fit into `size_t`.
|
|
static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(size_t), "int must not exceed size_t");
|
|
|
|
// Require that `int` be exactly 32 bits. OpenSSL historically mixed up
|
|
// `unsigned` and `uint32_t`, so we require it be at least 32 bits. Requiring
|
|
// at most 32-bits is a bit more subtle. C promotes arithmetic operands to
|
|
// `int` when they fit. But this means, if `int` is 2N bits wide, multiplying
|
|
// two maximum-sized `uintN_t`s is undefined by integer overflow!
|
|
//
|
|
// We attempt to handle this for `uint16_t`, assuming a 32-bit `int`, but we
|
|
// make no attempts to correct for this with `uint32_t` for a 64-bit `int`.
|
|
// Thus BoringSSL does not support ILP64 platforms.
|
|
//
|
|
// This test is on `INT_MAX` and `INT32_MAX` rather than sizeof because it is
|
|
// theoretically allowed for sizeof(int) to be 4 but include padding bits.
|
|
static_assert(INT_MAX == INT32_MAX, "BoringSSL requires int be 32-bit");
|
|
static_assert(UINT_MAX == UINT32_MAX,
|
|
"BoringSSL requires unsigned be 32-bit");
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<signed char>(127));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<signed char>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<signed char>(0));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<signed char>(-1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<signed char>(-42));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<signed char>(-128));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int>(INT_MAX));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int>(0x12345678));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int>(0));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int>(-1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int>(-0x12345678));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int>(INT_MIN));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<unsigned>(UINT_MAX));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<unsigned>(0x12345678));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<unsigned>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<unsigned>(0));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<long>(LONG_MAX));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<long>(0x12345678));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<long>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<long>(0));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<long>(-1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<long>(-0x12345678));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<long>(LONG_MIN));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<unsigned long>(ULONG_MAX));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<unsigned long>(0x12345678));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<unsigned long>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<unsigned long>(0));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int16_t>(0x7fff));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int16_t>(0x1234));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int16_t>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int16_t>(0));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int16_t>(-1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int16_t>(-0x7fff - 1));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint16_t>(0xffff));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint16_t>(0x1234));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint16_t>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint16_t>(0));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int32_t>(0x7fffffff));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int32_t>(0x12345678));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int32_t>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int32_t>(0));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int32_t>(-1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int32_t>(-0x7fffffff - 1));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint32_t>(0xffffffff));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint32_t>(0x12345678));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint32_t>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint32_t>(0));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int64_t>(0x7fffffffffffffff));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int64_t>(0x123456789abcdef0));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int64_t>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int64_t>(0));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int64_t>(-1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<int64_t>(-0x7fffffffffffffff - 1));
|
|
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint64_t>(0xffffffffffffffff));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint64_t>(0x12345678abcdef0));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint64_t>(1));
|
|
CheckRepresentation(static_cast<uint64_t>(0));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(CompilerTest, PointerRepresentation) {
|
|
// Converting pointers to integers and doing arithmetic on those values are
|
|
// both defined. Converting those values back into pointers is undefined,
|
|
// but, for aliasing checks, we require that the implementation-defined
|
|
// result of that computation commutes with pointer arithmetic.
|
|
char chars[256];
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(chars); i++) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(chars) + i,
|
|
reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(chars + i));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int ints[256];
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < std::size(ints); i++) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(ints) + i * sizeof(int),
|
|
reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(ints + i));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// nullptr must be represented by all zeros in memory. This is necessary so
|
|
// structs may be initialized by memset(0).
|
|
int *null = nullptr;
|
|
uint8_t bytes[sizeof(null)] = {0};
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(Bytes(bytes),
|
|
Bytes(reinterpret_cast<uint8_t *>(&null), sizeof(null)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static uintptr_t aba(uintptr_t *a, void **b) {
|
|
*a = (uintptr_t)1;
|
|
*b = nullptr;
|
|
return *a; // 0 if a == b, 1 if a and b are disjoint
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(CompilerTest, NoStrictAliasing) {
|
|
// Sequential memory access must be sequentially consistent across types.
|
|
// Compilers such as clang and gcc need to be passed -fno-strict-aliasing
|
|
// for this to remain true at higher optimization levels. Use with the
|
|
// opposite configuration, -fstrict-aliasing, is not supported.
|
|
// Even though some subset of type punning through memory is considered
|
|
// undefined behavior, the subtlety of exactly which subset that is and the
|
|
// limited sanitizer-tooling support make it impractical to avoid reliably.
|
|
uint8_t aliased[sizeof(void *)] = {};
|
|
uint8_t zeros[sizeof(void *)] = {};
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_memset(aliased, -1, sizeof(aliased));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(aba((uintptr_t *)aliased, (void **)aliased), (uintptr_t)0);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(Bytes(aliased), Bytes(zeros));
|
|
|
|
volatile auto volatile_aba = &aba;
|
|
OPENSSL_memset(aliased, -1, sizeof(aliased));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(volatile_aba((uintptr_t *)aliased, (void **)aliased), (uintptr_t)0);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(Bytes(aliased), Bytes(zeros));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
BSSL_NAMESPACE_END
|